• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation

Chrissy Rey

  • Home
  • Goals
  • Reflection Statement
  • Artifacts
  • Thoughts on Theory
  • LDT 100x
    • Comparing Learning Theories
    • Personal Learning Experiences
    • Behaviorism
    • Constructivism
    • Cognitivism
    • Andragogy
    • Authentic Assessment
    • Microlearning Project

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Goals
  • Reflection Statement
  • Artifacts
  • Thoughts on Theory
  • LDT 100x
    • Comparing Learning Theories
    • Personal Learning Experiences
    • Behaviorism
    • Constructivism
    • Cognitivism
    • Andragogy
    • Authentic Assessment
    • Microlearning Project

LDT 100x: Comparing Learning Theories

You are here: Home / Portfolio Items / LDT 100x: Comparing Learning Theories

In addition to the infographic, please also see the table below it for more information about each learning theory.

Learning TheoryBehaviorismConstructivismCognitivismConnectivismAndragogy
SummaryFocused on observable and measurable behaviors resulting from responses to stimuliLearning is an active and social process whereby new knowledge is constructed upon the foundation of previous experiencesFocused on the mental processes of the learner and how the mind receives, processes, stores, and retrieves informationEmphasizes how new technologies such as web browsers, social media, wikis, and online discussion forums have led to new ways of learningThe practice of teaching adult learners, which is also known as “adult education”
TheoristsIvan Pavlov, J.B. Watson, B.F. SkinnerJean Piaget, Lev VygotskyJerome Bruner, Albert BanduraGeorge Siemens, Stephen DownesMalcolm Knowles
Related ConceptsClassical Conditioning, Operant ConditioningMore Knowledgeable Other (MKO), Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD), ScaffoldingSocial Cognitive Theory, Cognitive Load TheoryMassive Online Open Course (MOOC)Formal vs. Informal vs. Non-formal Learning
StrengthsAllows teachers to use quizzes and tests to measure outcomes; works well for objective lessons, with clear “right” and “wrong” answersLearners are actively engaged instead of passive listeners; Emphasis on critical thinking skills, so students learn the “how” and “why” of the topicWell-suited for complex forms of learning, such as reasoning, analysis, and problem-solving; teachers can present new information in a manner that is meaningful to a learnerOpen-source approach to knowledge; Not limited by time or space; No central authority to determine what and how content is taught and learned  Understanding andragogy and applying the principles can lead to highly engaging learning experiences tailored specifically for adults
WeaknessesFocuses on the results and not the process; does not encourage critical thinking and analysis; punishment can weaken a behavior, but the underlying behavior still existsLess structure might be difficult for some students; Without traditional evaluation methods, it might be difficult for teachers to see when students are falling behindRelies on mental processes which we cannot directly observe; relies on active participation and intrinsic motivation of the learner, so if the learner is disinterested, learning might not be possibleThere may not be a clear path for learnersBecause the quality of adults’ lived experiences can vary, there may be a greater need for individualization of teaching and learning practices; Some teachers might find it challenging to change their teaching style to match the needs of adult learners
Implications for Instructional DesignGamification that rewards points and badges (positive reinforcement) for correct answers (desired behaviors); multiple-choice and true/false tests and quizzes to measure outcomesFocus on exploration; Provide opportunities for learners to observe and react to real-life situations; Use student-centered learning objectives such as justify, analyze, and evaluate; Encourage learners to reflect on their experiencesUse relevant examples and analogies so learners can make connections with previously learned material; Provide information in manageable pieces to allow learners to process new information effectively; Eliminate irrelevant details such as background music and decorative graphicsUse social media groups and online discussion; encourage exploration of online sources for informationGive learners the chance to choose their paths so they can learn what is relevant to their needs; Allow learners to share their experiences and demonstrate their capabilities using collaborative discussion and group activities. Discussion boards are great for this purpose; Address the learners’ needs quickly by aligning activities with real-world scenarios. Give them immediate opportunities to apply what they learn. Assign projects that will allow learners to demonstrate their skills.

Download/view a PDF version of this table.

References

Bandura A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K.G. Smith & M.A. Hitts (Eds.) Great Minds in Management (pp 9-35) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://d37djvu3ytnwxt.cloudfront.net/assets/courseware/v1/e57a5dfc0367fe26ee4ff80c9433e74e/asset-v1:USMx+LDT100x+2T2017_2+type@asset+block/Bandura2005.pdf

Blondy, L. C. (2007). Evaluation and application of andragogical assumptions to the adult online learning environment. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6, 116–130. Retrieved from http:// www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.2.3.pdf

Bruner, J. S. (1966) Toward a Theory of Instruction, Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press. 

Bruner, J. S. & Postman, L. (1949). On the perception of incongruity: A paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.

Cochran, C., & Brown, S. (2016). Andragogy and the Adult Learner. In Supporting the success of adult and online students: Proven practices in higher education (pp. 73–84). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Constructivism. Learning Theories. (2020, March 5). Retrieved October 5, 2021, from https://www.learning-theories.com/Constructivism.html.

Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: Comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(2), 43-71

Mellanby, J., & Theobald, K. (2014). Education and learning: An evidence-based approach. Wiley-Blackwell.

Michela, E. (2018). Cognitivism. In R. Kimmons, The Students’ Guide to Learning Design and Research. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/studentguide/cognitivism

Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2005). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (6th ed.). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.

Tscoshanov, M. (2013) Engineering of Learning: Conceptualizing e-Didactics. Moscow. Retrieved from https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214730.pdf

Western Governors University. (2021, May 27). Connectivism learning theory. Western Governors University. Retrieved October 22, 2021, from https://www.wgu.edu/blog/connectivism-learning-theory2105.html.

Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Child Psychiatry, 17, 89−100.

  • Home
  • Goals
  • Reflection Statement
  • Artifacts
  • Thoughts on Theory
  • LDT 100x

Site Footer

Copyright © 2025 · Mai Law Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in